Items on this page are from past several months. Some links may no longer be active.
Click on underlined extracts to read full articles.
Haz clic sobre extractos subrayados para leer articulos
completos.
Despite signs that the financial system has stabilized, banks remain threatened by billions of dollars of bad loans on their balance sheets, and more could fail if the economy worsens, a congressional watchdog reports.
In its latest assessment of the $700 billion financial system bailout,
the Congressional Oversight Panel warns that banks still hold many risky loans of uncertain value. If
unemployment rises sharply or the commercial real estate market collapses - as many economists fear - the banking system could again lose its footing, the panel says
in a report to be released Tuesday.
"The financial system (remains) vulnerable to the crisis conditions that (the
bailout) was meant to fix," the panel wrote in a draft copy of Tuesday's report.
The Congressional
Oversight Panel was created as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. It is designed to provide an additional
layer of oversight, beyond the Special Inspector General for the TARP and regular audits by the Government Accountability
Office.
The report says many of the Obama administration's financial stability
efforts are working - including infusions of new capital for banks, heightened scrutiny of capital ratios, "stress-testing"
of large financial firms. It also pointed to a public-private investment plan designed to buy up bad assets
that has yet to get off the ground.
Bubanks still holding the assets at the heart of the crisis, they
remain vulnerable, the panel says.
DEFICIT SOARS
The federal budget has gone from surplus to deficit during the past decade.
but uncertainty exists over the speed and duration of the economic recovery, according
to the most recent survey of private economists.
The Blue Chip Economic Indicators survey of private economists released on Monday showed
about 90 percent of the respondents surveyed believe the economic downturn will be declared to have ended this quarter.
This upbeat assessment followed recent government data showing gross domestic product
(GDP) contracted at a shallow 1.0 percent rate in the second quarter after sinking 6.4 percent in the January-March quarter.
Recent data, including housing
and key labor
market indicators, have suggested
a
bottoming in the recession and
the economy
close
to turning the corner
AGGRESSIVE
stimulus spending
by governments helped
the
world avoid a second Great
Depression, but full economic
recovery will take two years
or
more,
Nobel
Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman said...
He added that the worst of the global crisis was over, with economic
and exports growth showing signs of stabilisation.
Still, recovery is likely to be 'disappointing' as government spending
is not sustainable in the long run and the unemployment rate is still lagging behind, he told a two-day World Capital Markets
Symposium on Monday in Kuala Lumpur.
There is not likely to be any 'Phoenix-like' recovery, such as in
the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis when economies expanded dramatically, led by a sharp rebound in exports, he said.
'We have managed to avoid a second Great Depression...but full recovery
is at least two years and probably more,' Mr Krugman said. Asia is likely to see a faster rebound than the United States and
Europe, partly driven by recovery in manufacturing exports, he added.
La disipación de la crisis financiera depende
de las políticas internas, dice Enrique Iglesias
El secretario general Iberoamericano,
Enrique Iglesias, opinó hoy que la disipación de la crisis financiera global dependerá de las políticas internas de las naciones
y exhortó a fortalecer los programas de ayuda social.
For the first time, more than 34 million Americans received
food stamps,
which help poor people buy groceries, government figures said on Thursday, a
sign of the longest and one of the deepest recessions since the Great
Depression
Enrollment surged by 2 percent to reach a record 34.4 million people, or one
in nine Americans, in May, the latest month for which figures are available.
It was the sixth month in a row that enrollment set a record. Every state
recorded a gain in participation from April. Florida had the largest increase at
4.2 percent.
Food stamp enrollment is highest during times of economic stress. The U.S.
unemployment rate of 9.5 percent is the highest in 26 years.
Average benefit was $133.65 in May per person. The economic stimulus package
enacted earlier this year included a temporary increase in food stamp benefits
of $80 a month for a family of four...CLICK ON STAMPS TO READ MORE
Government Mortgage Program Gets Report Card
The government’s
refinancing and loan modification program is on track to offer assistance to up to three to four million
homeowners over the next three years, according to a Treasury Department report released Tuesday.
The report offered the first glimpse of how the Making Home Affordable Program has made headway in helping troubled
homeowners over the last few months.
More than 235,000 loan modifications and claims are now underway. The Obama
administration has said the program aims to help 500,000 borrowers by Nov.
1.
Examemagazine (one Brazil´s main business publications)
has published a cover story about the recent facts showing that thecrisis in Brazilwas short, and seems to be over.
The
key word here is “facts”. We are not talking about predictions from the same analysts who failed to see
the turmoil faced by the world after mid-2008. Various key indicators confirm that economic activity and job creation
have already undertaken a recovery process. While most of the world´s economies struggle to get out of the hole, Brazilian
economy is again growing.
Some
cases have become symbolic. Let´s take General Motors. While in the United States the car manufacturer is facing
all kinds of problems, and selling part of their Europe assets, in Brazil a R$ 2 billion investment plan is in place to expand
production. The Brazilian auto industry expects to sell 3 million units in 2009, a historic record in a years in which
everyone expected the worst.
A
recessionary scenario seemed realistic for 6 months, with reduction of the GDP, absence of credit, lack of confidence, production
interruption and slowing of sales. This reality is now only seen in the rearview mirror. Brazil is, in fact, experiencing
the next phase: recovery.
Employment
is also entering a considerable recovery process, after predictions pictured a dark. 300,000 new jobs were created on
the first 6 months of 2009, in the economy as a whole. In the end of last year 800,000 jobs were lost in the country, but
in 2009 a positive balance of 600,000 is expected (an exception amongst the world´s 20 largest economies).
It
is interesting to note that a country that has always been hardly hit by the world´s economic turmoils, this time is keeping
its head out of the water based mostly on internal demand. Consumers have not lost their appetite, even with reduction
of credit.
During
the last few weeks, Exame conducted a research with 360 companies in Brazil, which gives us a vision on the current business
and economic climate. Following are some noteworthy facts:
most companies expect considerable growth in Brazil´s GDP in 2009 (54% expect
1% to 3% growth)
48% say the effects of the crisis has diminished in their industry
only 17% do not expect growth in their companies
76% believe growth will be supported mostly or solely by the domestic market
70% are maintaining investments planned before the crisis overall sales are
higher than 1 year ago
cement sales grew 17% since February
vehicles, computers and household appliances are showing strong indications
of growth
consumer credit and real estate also show moderate recovery rates
general industrial production and credit for companies are showing a slower
recovery rate.
96% expect to keep current staffing or hire more people
Cinco consecuencias filosóficas de la crisis
La actual
crisis económica no se limita a una cuestión de estadísticas, ni se reduce al devastador impacto social del desempleo y la
incertidumbre
US State and Local Government Financal
Crisis Now Critical
A recent report by the National Conference of State
Legislatures tallied a total state shortfall of $113.2 billion in FY09 and a gap of $142.6 billion in FY10.Sixteen states, including Georgia,
have unemployment rates over 10%.Georgia
is one of 18 states facing a budget gap of 20% or more of its current budget.
These changes
cannot help but affect education.Utah
has enacted a shorter school year and legislators reduced funding for education by 13% (although part of this cut has been
“backfilled” with stimulus).North
Carolina cut state employee salaries, including teachers, by .5% giving them 10 hours of furlough
“leave.”Also, according to their Legislative Budget Office, teachers
will not receive step increases in FY10.California
has laid off 27,000 teachers.Nevada
cut K-12 teachers salaries by 4%.New
Mexico has cut all state employee pay, including teachers, by 1.5%, but will put the funds back as
an increased contribution to employee pensions.
CALIFORNIA SOLUTION:
LEGALZE AND TAX MARIJUANA
According to one poll, 56 percent of California voters say marijuana should be legalized
and taxed.
As many see it, marijuana is already virtually legal in California where state law allows it for
medical use....Bernard Melekian of the California Police Chiefs Association says "98 percent of the people who are acquiring
marijuana at these dispensaries do not appear to have the conditions for which the law was intended to apply."
Users in Oakland now pay a special city tax on medical marijuana - a first in the state, but maybe
not the last. Marijuana tax promoters say a lot of potential revenue is just going up in smoke.
There is talk in California of what you could call a radical idea for the cash-poor state to raise
money. It's controversial, but proponents say the plan could smoke out more than a billion dollars for the state...
It's
estimated that $14 billion worth of marijuana is sold illegally in the state. Making it legal and taxing it at $50 dollars
an ounce would bring in approximately $1.4 billion a year.
Alabama's debt-ridden Jefferson County laid off about two-thirds
of its 3,600 employees on Monday because of plummeting revenues, a move that will sharply curtail services in areas ranging
from roads to courthouses.
The cuts are just the latest blow to Jefferson, whose population
of 660,000 includesBirmingham,
the state's largest city and its economic powerhouse. They come after the county racked up around $4 billion in debt by using
exotic financial instruments to fund a revamp of its sewer system.
The work-force cuts will hit the roads and transportation, revenue
and security departments, and reductions will also affect the courthouse andinformation technology departmentas
well as laborers paid on an hourly basis, according to a senior county official...
Circuit Judge Joseph L. Boohaker ruled that leaders inJefferson County— now trying to head off a municipalbankruptcy filingof historic
proportions — could go ahead with plans to slash $4.1 million from the budget of Sheriff Mike Hale, who had filed a
lawsuit that temporarily blocked spending cuts for his office.
About 1,000 county workers already are on unpaid leave
because courts threw out a key county tax, and Hale has warned that reductions to his budget would mean fewer patrols by deputies
and decreased courthouse security.
A spokesman for Hale, Randy Christian, said the sheriff
toldGov.
Bob Rileyafter the ruling that state assistance may be needed to performbasic law enforcementtasks once the department's current funding is exhausted in early September.
"We will certainly be looking at calling in the National
Guard," said Christian.
Since
we received fresh data on Friday, it seems like an auspicious time to present a new version of my chart making this point:
The
green bar is the current recession. Most forecasters expect the economy to grow, albeit tepidly, in coming quarters. If they
are right, the estimated peak-to-trough GDP decline in this downturn is 3.9%. ...The chart has three main messages:
The current downturn is the worst since World War II (the green bar is larger than each of the four blue bars).
The current downturn is a far cry from the Great Depression (the green bar is much smaller than the red bar). You would
have to assume enormous further GDP declines to get anywhere near the stunning 26.7% peak-to-trough decline in GDP during
the Depression.
The economy contracted sharply (12.7%, the orange bar) after World War II. That’s why, from a GDP perspective, the
current downturn is the worst since World War II (defined for these purposes as stretching to 1947), not the worst since the
Great Depression.
SEE FULL ARTICLE ON DONALD MARRON'S WEBSITE BY CLICKING ON GLASSES
Warning: Oil supplies are running out fast
Catastrophic shortfalls threaten economic recovery, says world's top energy economist
The world is heading for a catastrophic energy
crunch that could cripple a global economic recovery because most of the major oil fields in the world have passed their peak
production, a leading energy economist has warned.
Higher oil prices brought on by a rapid increase in demand
and a stagnation, or even decline, in supply could blow any recovery off course, said Dr Fatih Birol, the chief economist
at the respected International Energy Agency (IEA) in Paris, which is charged with the task of assessing future energy supplies
by OECD countries.
In an interview with The Independent, Dr Birol said
that the public and many governments appeared to be oblivious to the fact that the oil on which modern civilisation depends
is running out far faster than previously predicted and that global production is likely to peak in about 10 years –
at least a decade earlier than most governments had estimated.
SEE FULL ARTICLE - CLICK ON GLASSES
NATIONAL INFLATION ASSOCIATION
Washington is Clueless About Inflation
It's
unfortunate that nobody in Washington understands what the true definition of inflation is. Inflation is the expansion of
money supply from the printing of money, low reserve requirements, and the Federal Reserve's open market operations. The hyperinflation
in Germany in the 1920's as well as in Zimbabwe today was caused by the government running their printing presses non-stop,
exactly like the U.S. is doing right now.
It just so happens that our massive printing of U.S. dollars has come at
the same time as the biggest bursting of any bubble in world history. Therefore, nobody will see inflation in the form of
rising prices until excess inventories are done being worked off. Eventually there will be too many dollars chasing too few
goods. Remember, none of the stimulus dollars are being spent for the increased production of goods. Manufacturing jobs are
way down and the only area of rising employment is non-productive government jobs.
The U.S. government wants inflation
because inflation benefits debtors and harms creditors, with the U.S. being the largest debtor nation in the world. If the
U.S. wants price inflation and the Federal Reserve takes every step in their power to create it, like they are doing today,
eventually price inflation will arrive but won't be possible to control.
TO READ MORE ON NIA
WEBSITE:
SEE MORE VIDEOS FROM THE NATIONAL INFLATION ASSOCIATION:
The US is on the brink of emerging from its 18-month-long recession according to the International Monetary
Fund, as official figures showed the American economy contracted by just 1pc in the second quarter of the year.
• Focus: Economic and financial
stabilization; developing exit strategies to eventually unwind extraordinary policy support; and dealing with the long-term
legacies of the crisis (weak financial supervision and regulation, massive fiscal imbalances, and damaged household balance
sheets).
• Assessment: Considerable progress has been made toward stabilizing the financial system,
though significant strains remain. The sharp contraction in economic activity is ending, aided by substantial macroeconomic
stimulus. However, the recovery is likely to be gradual, and downside risks prevail.
• Policy advice:
o Stabilization: the priority
is fully healing the financial system. Vigilance is warranted in light of remaining downside risks. Macroeconomic policies
can respond further if risks materialize. o Exiting extraordinary support: key elements include developing strategies
to withdraw public support from the financial system, and to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet, to position it to
pull back on monetary stimulus when a sustainable recovery is underway. Smooth communication will be key to set market
expectations. o Long-term legacies: broad and thorough reforms to financial regulation are needed to deal with
the shortcomings exposed by the crisis. Substantial fiscal adjustment will be needed to stabilize public debt, along
with measures to contain health care costs. Household balancesheet adjustment will likely weigh on growth over the medium
term while narrowing the external imbalance, with global implications.
Last week, President Obama stated his willingness to consider a commission to address our federal fiscal crisis. In an
interview with The Washington Post's Fred Hiatt, the President noted such a commission may be the most realistic
way to begin putting our nation's financial house in order, adding that "everything is going to have to be on the table" for
true fiscal reform.
"I was pleased to read Fred Hiatt's interview of President Obama published in the July 22nd edition of the Washington Post.
During the interview, the President stated his willingness to consider a fiscal commission where 'everything is going to have
to be on the table,' noting it may be the most realistic way to begin putting our nation's financial house in order.
"As I have stated for several years, tough choices must be made in connection with federal budget controls, entitlement
reforms, spending constraints and revenue increases. A properly structured and nonpartisan commission would engage the American
people about the true financial condition of our country and the need for a range of comprehensive reforms. This commission
can lay the groundwork for the ‘grand bargain’ President Obama has said he wants to achieve during his presidency.
"I applaud the President’s recognition that a fiscal commission may be the most productive way to address the serious
financial challenges threatening America's future. Such a commission should include appropriate members of Congress and the
Administration as well as several capable and credible non-governmental experts. After engaging the public and key stakeholders
in new and unprecedented ways, it should make a range of recommendations that would be guaranteed a vote by the Congress.
Ultimately, this extraordinary process can help us avert a much bigger potential economic crisis and ensure that our collective
future is better than our past."
Dave Walker President & CEO Peter G. Peterson Foundation
*Wells Fargo’s 2008 losses include losses from
Wachovia
The Recession
is Over
Now what we need
is a
new kind of
recovery.
The Great
Recession, which rolled over our financial lives like one of P.J. Keating's giant pavers, is most likely over. Home sales,
while still far below the levels of a year ago, have risen for three straight months—a first since 2004. The stock market
has rallied 44 percent since March, thanks to renewed optimism and improving earnings from big companies like Goldman Sachs
and Apple. In June, seven of the 10 indicators in the Conference Board Leading Economic Index pointed upward, including manufacturing
hours worked and unemployment claims. Macroeconomic Advisers, the St. Louis–based consulting firm, says the economy
is expanding at a 2.5 percent annual rate in the current quarter. Economic activity "will increase slightly over the remainder
of 2009," Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress.
"...we are concerned about the security of the Chinese assets..."
U.S. briefers said the president's team told the Chinese that the United
States was committed to making sure the economic and monetary stimulus being used to fight the recession did not fuel inflation.
U.S. officials told reporters that the U.S. side stressed to the Chinese
that the United States has a plan to bring the deficit down once the economic crisis has been resolved. They said Bernanke
discussed the Fed's exit strategy from the central bank's current period of extraordinary monetary easing, emphasizing that
the Fed was being careful to guard against future inflation.
The Chinese, who have the largest foreign holdings of U.S. Treasury
debt at $801.5 billion, have been expressing worries that soaring deficits could spark inflation or a sudden drop in the value
of the dollar, thus jeopardizing their investments. Chinese officials said those concerns were raised during Monday's talks.
"We sincerely hope the U.S. fiscal deficit will be reduced, year after
year," Assistant Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao told reporters after the Monday talks had ended.
"The Chinese government is a responsible government and first and foremost
our responsibility is the Chinese people, so of course we are concerned about the security of the Chinese assets," Zhu said,
speaking through an interpreter.
The discussions on America's deficits and China's role in financing
them highlighted the growing economic importance of China, now the world's third largest economy...
Bernanke expressed particular opposition
to a proposal in Congress for the Government Accounting Office to be able to "audit" the Fed's interest rate decisions. "I
don't think that's consistent with independence. I don't think the American people want Congress running monetary policy.
That's exactly what (the bill) would do," he said.
"...once the recovery began – in different calendar years in different countries – the
average rate of growth was strong. GDP growth in the first year after the Great Depression averaged 4.7 per cent, followed
by 4.6 per cent in the second and third years...
The world economy is in its worst recession since the early ’80s.
During the second half of 2008 world credit markets froze and international
trade suffered a sudden 20% decline. The slump in world trade resulted in a sharp fall in exports in the major and emerging
markets, confirming that the world economy is more interlinked than ever through trade and capital flows.
In recent months credit markets have started to thaw. As credit flows normalised,
so bank and corporate bond spreads narrowed sharply from historic highs. Many economic indicators are starting to show signs
of recovery.
Government and central bank policies restored some investor confidence in
financial markets and equity prices recovered ground as fears of a ’30s-style depression receded.
Although government and central bank policies appear to be gaining traction,
we believe there are longer-term costs to these policies. Extremely low interest rates are not sustainable over the long term
and as economic activity revives, interest rates need to rise.
IFAC has launched a resource center
to help professional accountants address issues related to the global financial crisis. The center (http://www.ifac.org/financial-crisis/) serves as an international clearinghouse of programs,
articles, speeches, and other initiatives undertaken by IFAC, its independent standard-setting boards, members and associates,
as well as other organizations that are relevant to professional accountants.
To assist professional accountants in addressing
issues related to the global financial crisis, IFAC and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) have
focused on three activities:
+ To increase awareness among preparers and
auditors of existing and newly developed guidance that can assist them in reporting on financial instruments;
+ To encourage further convergence in reporting
standards on financial instruments, while at the same time strongly supporting (the continuation of) fair value accounting
since reducing transparency is not in the interests of investors; and
+ To participate in and promote discussions
of best practice with respect to the audits of financial institutions and other organizations that are affected by the current
crisis.
View President Obama's July 22 Health Reform Press Conference (approx. 1 hour)
The economic indicators we follow to track real economic activity
are all signaling a slowdown of massive proportions. You wouldn’t know it reading the mainstream papers of course
– they all focus on the relative decline in the slowdown’s intensity. Reading about the slowdown ‘slowing
down’ is not the same as growth however, and does not warrant excitement in our opinion.
We
find the similarity between the 2008 economic collapse and the 1929 economic collapse disturbing. Don’t get sucked
in… the real economy is still struggling and the market has yet to reflect this. In 1932, the
Dow
Jones Industrial Average bottomed 90% below the September 1929 peak. The S&P 500 Index peaked in October 2007 at
1,576, and from our brief analysis above we can easily calculate a drop in the S&P 500 of as much as 88% from that
peak using our ‘double trouble’ scenario. At the very least, under all of our scenarios it appears that the
S&P 500 Index will test the March 2009 low of 666. Judging by the continued declines we are seeing in the real economy,
we expect that test to happen sooner rather than later.
In our view, the only thing propping
this market up is investor sentiment. Earnings have not improved.
US
industry used only 68.3% of available capacity in May 2009, according to a monthly report from the Federal Reserve.1
That represents almost one third of all US industrial capacity sitting idle. Prior to the current recession, the lowest
rate recorded since the Fed started this series of records in 1967 was 70.9% in December 1982.
The
US government has spent $2.67 trillion thus far in fiscal 2009, but has only collected $1.59 trillion.
The
US government collected $685.5 billion in individual income taxes so far this year, a 22% drop from the $877.8 billion
the government took in during the first nine months of 2008.
US corporate income taxes plunged 57%
to $101.9 billion in 2009, down from $236.5 billion in the first nine months of fiscal year 2008.
4
million Americans have been looking for work for more than 26 weeks, representing
29% of the unemployed
– the most since records began in 1948.
During the last 30 years, Americans who lost their jobs
took an average 15.8 weeks to find new positions. In June 2009, the average duration of unemployment was 24.5 weeks,
the longest since records began in 1948.
The number of people collecting unemployment benefits
reached a record 6.88 million in the week ended June 27, 2009.
Approximately six people are seeking
work for every job opening, the most since the government began keeping such records in 2000. A year ago, the ratio was
a little more than two-to-one...Sprott
Asset Management
Are
We in the Early Stages of a Economic Depression? A Comment on the above analysis
I do not disagree...The risks in our economy remain exceptionally
high. The stock market is in the process of defining winners and losers but overall is being supported by massive liquidity
injected into the overall economy by Uncle Sam (Fed and Treasury).
What
may cause the next leg down in the economy? Commercial real estate defaults which will impact a large number of banks (community,
regional, and money center) and insurance companies.
Recession?
Depression? Let’s just say by either definition, we have a long way to go.
For a glimpse of what awaits
Britain, Europe, and America as budget deficits spiral to war-time levels, look at what is happening to the Irish welfare
state.
Events have already forced Premier Brian Cowen to carry out the harshest assault yet
seen on the public services of a modern Western state. He has passed two emergency budgets to stop the deficit soaring to
15pc of GDP. They have not been enough...
The Fed's doctrine – New Keynesian Synthesis – has
let it down time and again in this long saga, and there is scant evidence that Fed officials recognise the fact. As for the
European Central Bank, it has let private loan growth contract this summer.
The imperative for the debt-bloated West is to cut spending systematically
for year after year, off-setting the deflationary effect with monetary stimulus. This is the only mix that can save us.
Bernanke
afirmó que el plan anticrisis no provocará inflación en EE.UU.
El presidente de la Fed aseguró que la entidad posee "numerosas herramientas eficaces para ajustar la
política monetaria" cuando la economía retome la senda del crecimiento; advirtió que se mantendrá el desempleo
(NOTE: By comparison the estimated population
offishin
the oceans is 3,500,000,000,000
or 3.5 trillion...
the estimated number of humans on Earth is
6,760,000,000 or 6.76 billion...
and the estimated number of ants is
200,000,000,000,000 or 200 trillion
thus $23.7 Trillion
=
$3,506 per human being
or $ 6.77 per
fish
or 12 ¢ per ant)
The total price tag for federal support stemming from
the financial crisis could reach $23.7 trillion in the long run, the government's top bailout watchdog says in a new report
to Congress.
Neil Barofsky, the inspector general for the Troubled
Asset Relief Program, plans to deliver his report Tuesday to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
The $23.7 trillion figure is admittedly a high-ball
number and reflects the total potential gross exposure, but Barofsky in his prepared testimony notes that the TARP -- which
started as a $700 billion bailout -- has expanded well beyond that.
"TARP has evolved into a program of unprecedented scope,
scale and complexity. Moreover, TARP does not function in a vacuum but is rather part of the broader government efforts to
stabilize the financial system," the report says.
"The total potential federal government support could
reach up to $23.7 trillion," the report estimates, factoring in commitments from "dozens of programs" implemented throughout
the federal government since 2007
"A trillion here, a trillion there will get things
stabilized"
Gary Schilling
I think that what the government has done so far, despite the trillions of dollars,
is questionable. People are miserable. They are saving all their cash, their social-security checks, and many people are still
in big trouble. Modifications of troubled mortgages are proceeding slowly, and those that are modified are proving to be serial
defaulters. More than 50 percent are behind in payments.
What people need is a consumer subsidy to help them handle
their mortgages. The government gave trillions of dollars for bailout programs -- now it should give another trillion to consumers.
A trillion here, a trillion there will get things stabilized...
Of $3.1 trillion in total commercial real estate debt, banks and thrifts hold $1.7 trillion
in mortgages. Another $700 billion is securitized, and the delinquency rate more than tripled in six months, to 2.7 percent
in May, the highest in a decade. Default rates are expected to hit 30 percent or more, and loss rates could reach 13 percent...
The estimates are that $155 billion in securitizations are coming due by 2012, and two-thirds
won't qualify for refinancing as prices drop 35 percent to 45 percent from their 2007 peaks. Meanwhile, $525 billion of commercial mortgages
held by banks and thrifts will come due by 2012. About 50 percent won't qualify for refinancing because they exceed 90 percent
of the underlying property value. Lenders prefer loans of no more than 65 percent...
I have been saying it will go for a second stimulus package. The first one was for education,
health and the environment, and was intended to put people to work. There is a lot of resistance to another package, though,
and further increases to the deficit. Our estimate is that $200 billion went to stimulus for infrastructure, unemployment
and tax cuts, and the rest was for social agenda: education, health and environment...
It will extend into early 2010. Only by then is enough fiscal stimulus likely to be pumped out to stabilize
consumer retrenchment. By then, enough excess house inventories may be absorbed to moderate the downward pressure on prices.
By then, most of the global financial woes should be at least stabilized. Nevertheless, a weak recovery is likely to follow,
one so tepid and with such high unemployment that you may not know it has arrived.
Is securitization like a financial terrorist attack?
A recent editorial in the Wall Street Journal makes it clear that securitization -- the packaging of thousands of loans
into securities -- has all the features of a successful terrorist attack. How so? It entered the financial system without
attracting any negative notice at all, found its way into the heart of the global financial markets and, once ensconced there,
proceeded to destroy the system (and is continuing to do so now).
In fact, securitization is proving to be more costly from a financial standpoint than everything that al Qaeda has cooked
up against us. So far, the financial rescue has cost $12.8 trillion and that figure could reach as high as $23.7 trillion.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost only $3 trillion at most. (To be fair, though, securitization has taken a far smaller
human toll than al Qaeda.)
Why do I blame securitization for our current financial calamity? Remember toxic waste? That's the $13 trillion worth
of residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS) -- bundles of mortgages sliced by level of risk -- and collateralized debt
obligations (CDOs) -- mixed bundles of commercial mortgages, auto loans, student loans, credit card receivables, small business
loans, and corporate loans sorted by risk level -- residing on the books of financial institutions around the globe.
Securitization is not the sole problem -- it is the fact that some financial institutions (FIs) leveraged up their balance
sheets 50:1 to buy the toxic waste. And they bought it because they believed that in a low-interest-rate environment, they
thought they were getting a safe, higher-yielding investment...
Under current law, the federal budget is on an unsustainable
path, because federal debt will continue to grow much faster than the economy over the long run. Although great uncertainty
surrounds long-term fiscal projections, rising costs for health care and the aging of the population will cause federal spending
to increase rapidly under any plausible scenario for current law. Unless revenues increase just as rapidly, the rise in spending
will produce growing budget deficits. Large budget deficits would reduce national saving, leading to more borrowing from abroad
and less domestic investment, which in turn would depress economic growth in the United States. Over time, accumulating
debt would cause substantial harm to the economy. The following chart shows our projection of federal debt
relative to GDP under the two scenarios we modeled.
Federal Debt Held by the Public Under CBO’s Long-Term Budget Scenarios
(Percentage of GDP)
Keeping deficits and debt from reaching these levels would
require increasing revenues significantly as a share of GDP, decreasing projected spending sharply, or some combination of
the two.
Measured relative to GDP, almost all of the projected growth
in federal spending other than interest payments on the debt stems from the three largest entitlement programs—Medicare,
Medicaid, and Social Security. For decades, spending on Medicare and Medicaid has been growing faster than the economy. CBO
projects that if current laws do not change, federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid combined will grow from roughly 5 percent
of GDP today to almost 10 percent by 2035. By 2080, the government would be spending almost as much, as a share of the economy,
on just its two major health care programs as it has spent on all of its programs and services in recent years.
In CBO’s estimates, the increase in spending for Medicare
and Medicaid will account for 80 percent of spending increases for the three entitlement programs between now and 2035 and
90 percent of spending growth between now and 2080. Thus, reducing overall government spending relative to what would occur
under current fiscal policy would require fundamental changes in the trajectory of federal health spending. Slowing the growth
rate of outlays for Medicare and Medicaid is the central long-term challenge for fiscal policy.
Under current law, spending on Social Security is also projected
to rise over time as a share of GDP, but much less sharply. CBO projects that Social Security spending will increase from
less than 5 percent of GDP today to about 6 percent in 2035 and then roughly stabilize at that level. Meanwhile, as depicted
below, government spending on all activities other than Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and interest on federal debt—a
broad category that includes national defense and a wide variety of domestic programs—is projected to decline or stay
roughly stable as a share of GDP in future decades.
Spending Other Than That for Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security,
and Net Interest, 1962 to 2080 (Percentage of GDP)
Federal spending on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security
will grow relative to the economy both because health care spending per beneficiary is projected to increase and because the
population is aging. As shown in the figure below, between now and 2035, aging is projected to make the larger contribution
to the growth of spending for those three programs as a share of GDP. After 2035, continued increases in health care spending
per beneficiary are projected to dominate the growth in spending for the three programs.
Factors Explaining Future Federal Spending on Medicare, Medicaid,
and Social Security (Percentage of GDP)
The current recession and policy responses have little effect
on long-term projections of noninterest spending and revenues. But CBO estimates that in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, the federal
government will record its largest budget deficits as a share of GDP since shortly after World War II. As a result of those
deficits, federal debt held by the public will soar from 41 percent of GDP at the end of fiscal year 2008 to 60 percent at
the end of fiscal year 2010. This higher debt results in permanently higher spending to pay interest on that debt. Federal
interest payments already amount to more than 1 percent of GDP; unless current law changes, that share would rise to 2.5 percent
by 2020.
This entry was posted on Thursday, July
16th, 2009
VP Joe Biden: ‘We Have to Go Spend Money to Keep From Going Bankrupt’
Vice President Joe Biden (Photo
by Penny Starr/CNSNews.com)
Vice President Joe Biden
told people attending an AARP town hall meeting that unless the Democrat-supported health care plan becomes law the nation
will go bankrupt and that the only way to avoid that fate is for the government to spend more money...the president
knows, and I know, that the status quo is simply not acceptable,” Biden said...“It’s totally unacceptable.
And it’s completely unsustainable. Even if we wanted to keep it the way we have it now. It can’t do it financially.”
“We’re
going to go bankrupt as a nation,” Biden said.
“Now, people when I say that look at me and say,
‘What are you talking about, Joe? You’re telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?’”
Biden said. “The answer is yes, that's what I’m telling you.”
IT HAS ONLY BEEN IN THE LAST 8 YEARS
THAT THE % OF INCOME SPENT BY AMERICANS HAS BEEN IN SINGLE DIGITS...before the year 2000 it was over 10% and until the 1950's
it was over 20%.
Estudio económico de América Latina
y el Caribe 2008-2009
Comisión Económica para América
Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL)
RESUMEN
La publicación del sexagésimo primer Estudio económico de América Latina y el Caribe, correspondiente
al bienio 2008-2009, tiene lugar en un momento crítico del desarrollo económico de América Latina y el Caribe. Se interrumpió
una fase de crecimiento de duración y características inéditas en la historia reciente y la región sufre una contracción de
su producto, con efectos negativos en el bienestar de la población que inevitablemente se reflejarán en retrocesos de las
variables sociales. Dos características diferencian la situación actual de los muchos episodios de crisis que afectaron a
la región en las décadas pasadas. En primer lugar, la crisis no se originó en la región ni tampoco en otra economía emergente,
sino en la economía más grande del mundo, por lo que tuvo efectos a nivel global, con significativas diferencias entre países
y regiones. En segundo lugar, si bien con excepciones significativas, al disminuir sus deudas e incrementar sus reservas durante
la fase expansiva de los años pasados, la región en su conjunto está mejor preparada para enfrentar esta crisis que en episodios
previos y que otras regiones. Estas características, por su parte, tienen dos consecuencias: la tasa de contracción proyectada
para el año en curso es relativamente moderada —si bien nuevamente con marcadas diferencias entre los países de la región—
y la recuperación depende en gran parte de la reactivación de la economía mundial en su conjunto.
En la primera parte de este Estudio económico se analizan los canales a través de los cuales
la crisis está afectando a las economías de la región y su efecto en variables como el crecimiento económico, el empleo y
los indicadores del sector externo. También se presentan las fortalezas y debilidades para enfrentar las consecuencias de
la crisis mundial y las políticas económicas aplicadas en este contexto. El análisis abarca la evolución de la economía regional
en 2008 y el primer semestre de 2009 y concluye con un examen de las perspectivas de la región en el segundo semestre del
año, todo ello respaldado con un amplio anexo estadístico.
Las características de la recuperación dependen en gran medida de la evolución de la economía
mundial, pero también de la manera en que los países se preparan para los desafíos del futuro. A este respecto, es importante
el manejo macroeconómico de la crisis, pero también, como la CEPAL ha enfatizado en repetidas ocasiones, la construcción de
los fundamentos para un crecimiento sostenido, basado en una creciente competitividad sistémica, una mayor cohesión social
y una estructura productiva y de consumo ambientalmente sostenible. Por lo tanto, una tarea clave de los países de la región
es el desarrollo de instituciones acordes con estos objetivos. En este Estudio económico se analiza el caso de la institucionalidad
laboral, que en el pasado reciente ha sido objeto de confrontaciones polarizadas y debates sumamente controvertidos. No obstante,
actualmente se han abierto espacios para un debate más equilibrado que tome en cuenta que esta institucionalidad debe cumplir
con varios objetivos, lo que no permite la imposición de visiones particulares.
En el primer capítulo de la segunda parte se revisa el desarrollo histórico de la institucionalidad
laboral de la región, la gran variedad existente al respecto entre los países y el papel de los principales componentes de
esta institucionalidad. En el segundo capítulo, se presentan los cambios recientes en algunas instituciones específicas, el
salario mínimo, los sindicatos y la negociación colectiva, así como los instrumentos de protección al desempleo, y se analizan
sus efectos sobre el funcionamiento del mercado de trabajo y las opciones para su perfeccionamiento. En el tercer capítulo,
se examinan las políticas activas del mercado de trabajo, específicamente la capacitación y formación profesional, los servicios
públicos de empleo, la generación directa e indirecta de empleo y el fomento del trabajo independiente. En el cuarto capítulo,
se discuten alternativas de política para promover la inserción laboral productiva de los jóvenes y las mujeres, quienes con
frecuencia son marginados y discriminados en el mercado laboral. El quinto capítulo resume las conclusiones sobre los desafíos
de la institucionalidad laboral y los mecanismos para avanzar en el cumplimiento de sus objetivos.
Por último, se analiza la coyuntura de los países de América Latina y el Caribe en 2008 y el
primer semestre de 2009. A la información de las notas de cada país se suman los datos del anexo estadístico en el que se
muestra la evolución de los principales indicadores económicos. Estas notas, al igual que el anexo estadístico específico
para cada país, se publican en el CD-ROM que acompaña la versión impresa, así como también en la página web de la CEPAL (www.cepal.org). En los cuadros del anexo estadístico se puede visualizar rápidamente la información de los
últimos años y crear cuadros en hojas electrónicas. En el disco se encuentran también las versiones electrónicas de la primera
y la segunda parte.
La información estadística de la presente publicación ha sido actualizada al 30 de junio de
2009. Haz clic en su pais para el contenido...
From FORBES: The U.S. economic outlook
remains very weak.
The United States is in the twentieth month of a recession that has been by
far the longest and most severe of the postwar period. While comparisons with the Great Depression are frequent and appropriate
(especially if we look at the pace of contraction in industrial production), the aggressiveness of policy measures has significantly
reduced the probability of a near-depression.
"Banking Establishments Are More Dangerous Than Standing Armies." Thomas Jefferson
(1743-1826), 3rd US President
"...
a serious depression seems improbable; [we expect] recovery of business next spring, with further improvement in the fall."
Harvard Economic Society (HES), November 10, 1929
"While
the crash only took place six months ago, I am convinced we have now passed through the worst -- and with continued unity
of effort we shall rapidly recover. There has been no significant bank or industrial failure. That danger, too, is safely
behind us." President Herbert Hoover, May 1, 1930
"Under
a paper money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation." Fed Chairman
Ben Bernanke, in 2002
Many
observers think that “prosperity is around the corner” and that this recession, like others since World War II,
will end as soon as the stock market, as a leading indicator, recovers and people start spending again. This is a myopic view
of the current economic big picture.
In fact, since the peak of the housing bubble (in the U.S.) in 2005, the onslaught of the subprime financial
crisis in August 2007 and the beginning of the recession in December 2007, the U. S. economy, and to a certain extent, the
world economy, have entered a period of protracted adjustments. For sure, there will be some quarters of positive economic
growth ahead and the recession may be declared officially over in the coming months, but the radical economic reorganization
that is taking place will go on for years to come...........................................................................................
For
now, a quick resurgence of inflation is only a remote possibility. This is nevertheless a possibility, considering that central
banks have a tendency to overdo the printing of fiat money. In fact, if governements attempt to print their way out of the
coming structural demographic problem, they will end up generating an hyperstagflation. In a nutshell, this is what the huge
international dollar-denominated bond market sees and fears, at a time when it has to absorb a huge supply of new bond issues.
In reality, the bond market will always win against any central bank, any time. The solvency woes and the likely default of
the state of California on its outstanding debt will only add to the anxiety.
A
few weeks ago, I warned against the risk of future long term interest rates hikes and future U.S. dollar depreciation following
the decisions by the U.S. Treasury and by the Fed to flood the markets with trillions of dollars of new Treasury bond issues
and with newly printed money. The undertow is coming even faster than I thought. Only when the markets expect relative economic
stagnation and a lasting deflationary environment will long term interest rates taper off.
Brace yourself and hold on to your britches. There is a rough economic decade ahead.
In a year of eye-popping numbers, add one more: The government's annual
budget deficit has topped $1 trillion.
And
with three months left in the budget year, it will actually get even worse. The administration is projecting that the deficit
will hit $1.84 trillion for the current budget year, four times the size of last year's deficit. Last year's number was the
all-time leader at the time, at $454.8 billion — a figure that now seems rather puny in comparison.
Here
are some questions and answers about what happened to the federal budget, which began the new century with the longest string
of surpluses in seven decades.